AAPTP
  • Small
  • Medium
  • Large
  • Small
  • Medium
  • Large
  • Home
  • Handbook
    • Asphalt Paving Handbook
    • Videos
    • Figures
    • Tables
  • Checklists
  • Abbreviations
  • About
  • HOME
  • Handbook
    • Asphalt Paving Handbook
    • Videos
    • Figures
    • Tables
  • CHECKLISTS
  • ABBREVIATIONS
  • About
1. Introduction (0)
2. Project Organization (3)
3. Asphalt Materials and Mix Design (2)
4. Mix Production (2)
5. Surface Preparation (3)
6. Mixture Delivery (4)
7. Mix Placement (3)
8. Compaction (4)
9. Joint Construction (3)
10. Segregation (2)
11. Quality Assurance (8)
12. Mat Problems (3)
13. Appendix (0)
1. Introduction (1)
2. Project Organization (2)
3. Asphalt Materials and Mix Design (17)
4. Mix Production (35)
5. Surface Preparation (17)
6. Mixture Delivery (6)
7. Mix Placement (30)
8. Compaction (13)
9. Joint Construction (27)
10. Segregation (11)
11. Quality Assurance (4)
12. Mat Problems (12)
13. Appendix (0)
1. Introduction (0)
2. Project Organization (0)
3. Asphalt Materials and Mix Design (3)
4. Mix Production (1)
5. Surface Preparation (4)
6. Mixture Delivery (0)
7. Mix Placement (0)
8. Compaction (1)
9. Joint Construction (0)
10. Segregation (0)
11. Quality Assurance (3)
12. Mat Problems (1)
13. Appendix (0)
Back

All Tables

Table 2. AASHTO M 323 Aggregate Consensus Property Requirements
Table 2. AASHTO M 323 Aggregate Consensus Property Requirements
Source: AASHTO

The anticipated project traffic level expected on the design lane over a 20-year period. Regardless of the actual design life of the roadway, determine the design ESALs for a 20-year period.
This criterion does not apply to 4.75-mm nominal maximum size mixtures.
85/80 denotes that 85 percent of the coarse aggregate has at least one fractured face and 80 percent has two or more fractured faces.
For 4.75-mm nominal maximum size mixtures designed for traffic levels below 0.3 million ESALs, the minimum uncompacted void content is 40.
For 4.75-mm nominal maximum size mixtures designed for traffic levels equal to or above 0.3 million ESALs, the minimum uncompacted void content is 45.

Source: AASHTO

  1. The anticipated project traffic level expected on the design lane over a 20-year period. Regardless of the actual design life of the roadway, determine the design ESALs for a 20-year period.
  2. This criterion does not apply to 4.75-mm nominal maximum size mixtures.
  3. 85/80 denotes that 85 percent of the coarse aggregate has at least one fractured face and 80 percent has two or more fractured faces.
  4. For 4.75-mm nominal maximum size mixtures designed for traffic levels below 0.3 million ESALs, the minimum uncompacted void content is 40.
  5. For 4.75-mm nominal maximum size mixtures designed for traffic levels equal to or above 0.3 million ESALs, the minimum uncompacted void content is 45.

Note: If less than 25 percent of a construction lift is within 100 mm of the surface, the lift may be considered to below 100 mm for mix design purposes.

Previous Table
Next Table

© National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA). All rights reserved|Privacy Policy

6406 Ivy Lane, Suite 350 Greenbelt, Maryland 20770-1441

|888-468-6499
Information

There are no items associated with the selected chapter.